alkinun
AtAndDev
AI & ML interests
decentralize
Recent Activity
reacted to DedeProGames's post with ๐ฅ about 4 hours ago
We are working on LFM3-1.7B-Ox, a compact model for repo-level programming, agentic coding, and tinkering. reacted to Banaxi-Tech's post with ๐ฅ about 14 hours ago
We're introducing KV1 1.2B.
Its our first KV1 model using a 2 bit KV cache, based on LFM 2.5 1.2B.
KV1 1.2B retains 75.8% of original intelligence.
More details: https://huggingface.co/spaces/klein-ml/blog#kv1-1.2b
Model https://huggingface.co/klein-ml/KV1-1.2B
reacted to Banaxi-Tech's post with ๐ฅ 1 day ago
BananaMind 3 is coming.
Biggest context in all SLMs with NSA.
10M, 50M, 150M, 400M.
And maybe, 1B.Organizations
reacted to DedeProGames's post with ๐ฅ about 4 hours ago
reacted to Banaxi-Tech's post with ๐ฅ about 14 hours ago
Post
2,333
We're introducing KV1 1.2B.
Its our first KV1 model using a 2 bit KV cache, based on LFM 2.5 1.2B.
KV1 1.2B retains 75.8% of original intelligence.
More details: klein-ml/blog
Model klein-ml/KV1-1.2B
Its our first KV1 model using a 2 bit KV cache, based on LFM 2.5 1.2B.
KV1 1.2B retains 75.8% of original intelligence.
More details: klein-ml/blog
Model klein-ml/KV1-1.2B
reacted to Banaxi-Tech's post with ๐ฅ 1 day ago
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with ๐ฅ๐ 1 day ago
Post
6,501
๐ฆ๏ธ Which weather model is most accurate? We score them every day, in the open.
We released two things on Hugging Face:
๐ Global Weather Model Leaderboard
Every day it records what each global model predicted for 24 world cities, compares it with what actually happened (ERA5), and updates the ranking. ECMWF IFS and AIFS, NOAA GFS and AIGFS, DWD ICON, JMA, ECCC GEM, MET Norway, side by side, on the same cases, since 1 January 2026.
Four elements, four tabs: max temperature, min temperature, wind, precipitation. Forecast leads from 1 to 7 days, with 8 to 10 days joining as they are verified.
๐งฌ Darwin-Prediction-Weather
VIDRAFT's weather prediction system: a fusion engine that combines global forecasts, learning only from days already observed. It holds the lowest error in all four elements at every lead on the 2026 record, and the lowest error in all 15 evaluated cells of the WeatherBench 2 (2020) protocol.
What the 2026 record shows so far:
โข AI models now lead physics models at the major centres (AIFS vs IFS, AIGFS vs GFS)
โข Fusion goes further: 7-day max temperature RMSE 2.09 ยฐC vs 2.41 ยฐC for the next model
Also inside: yesterday's results with a daily WIN for the closest model, a 10-day outlook for every city, champions by city and by month, and a Live Earth map with wind, clouds, radar and temperature.
Every forecast and every observed value is open as CSV, so anyone can check the scores.
๐ Article: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/which-weather-model-is-most-accurate-we-score-them
๐ Leaderboard: FINAL-Bench/Weather-Model-Leaderboard
๐งฌ Model: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-Prediction-Weather
๐ Daily record: FINAL-Bench/Weather-Model-Forecast-Archive
Questions, corrections and new models to add are welcome.
We released two things on Hugging Face:
๐ Global Weather Model Leaderboard
Every day it records what each global model predicted for 24 world cities, compares it with what actually happened (ERA5), and updates the ranking. ECMWF IFS and AIFS, NOAA GFS and AIGFS, DWD ICON, JMA, ECCC GEM, MET Norway, side by side, on the same cases, since 1 January 2026.
Four elements, four tabs: max temperature, min temperature, wind, precipitation. Forecast leads from 1 to 7 days, with 8 to 10 days joining as they are verified.
๐งฌ Darwin-Prediction-Weather
VIDRAFT's weather prediction system: a fusion engine that combines global forecasts, learning only from days already observed. It holds the lowest error in all four elements at every lead on the 2026 record, and the lowest error in all 15 evaluated cells of the WeatherBench 2 (2020) protocol.
What the 2026 record shows so far:
โข AI models now lead physics models at the major centres (AIFS vs IFS, AIGFS vs GFS)
โข Fusion goes further: 7-day max temperature RMSE 2.09 ยฐC vs 2.41 ยฐC for the next model
Also inside: yesterday's results with a daily WIN for the closest model, a 10-day outlook for every city, champions by city and by month, and a Live Earth map with wind, clouds, radar and temperature.
Every forecast and every observed value is open as CSV, so anyone can check the scores.
๐ Article: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/which-weather-model-is-most-accurate-we-score-them
๐ Leaderboard: FINAL-Bench/Weather-Model-Leaderboard
๐งฌ Model: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-Prediction-Weather
๐ Daily record: FINAL-Bench/Weather-Model-Forecast-Archive
Questions, corrections and new models to add are welcome.
upvoted a paper 3 days ago
upvoted a collection 5 days ago
reacted to sergiopaniego's post with ๐๐ฅ 5 days ago
Post
6,793
New post-training example: SFT on agent traces with TRL
โ A large model works as a coding agent in OpenCode, run through OpenEnv
โ The tasks it solves become the training data
โ A 2B model goes from 5.5% to 34.4% on held-out tasks
About 500 traces get most of the gain. Five times more add only 3 to 4 points, so SFT gets the agent working and RL has to do the rest
Full guide, with the models, traces and every rollout open:
https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/sft_agent_traces
โ A large model works as a coding agent in OpenCode, run through OpenEnv
โ The tasks it solves become the training data
โ A 2B model goes from 5.5% to 34.4% on held-out tasks
About 500 traces get most of the gain. Five times more add only 3 to 4 points, so SFT gets the agent working and RL has to do the rest
Full guide, with the models, traces and every rollout open:
https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/sft_agent_traces
replied to Banaxi-Tech's post 6 days ago
oh nice! well, good luck. very excited.
replied to Banaxi-Tech's post 6 days ago
reacted to Banaxi-Tech's post with ๐ฅ 6 days ago
Post
4,902
We're excited to release BananaMind 2.5 Pro.
It's done some post-training on our BananaMind 2 Pro base, via distillation of SmolLM2 360M.
It scores 28.98 INT INDEX compared to 24.96 of BananaMind 2 Pro on the AxiomicLabs/Open_SLM_Leaderboard
Check it out at BananaMind/BananaMind-2.5-Pro
BananaMind
@ArushCodes
@Bc-AI
It's done some post-training on our BananaMind 2 Pro base, via distillation of SmolLM2 360M.
It scores 28.98 INT INDEX compared to 24.96 of BananaMind 2 Pro on the AxiomicLabs/Open_SLM_Leaderboard
Check it out at BananaMind/BananaMind-2.5-Pro
@ArushCodes
@Bc-AI
reacted to savoji's post with ๐ฅ 7 days ago
Post
2,512
Idol, a new Apache-2.0 image-to-3D model from @speridlabs , makes a 3D Gaussian splat from one image in 7.2 GB of peak VRAM. It is the #1 trending model on the Hub with 1,057 likes.
It writes a standard 3DGS .ply with up to 1,048,576 Gaussians, including sides the picture never showed, and does background removal and framing itself. The catch: the only quality evidence is the authors' own benchmark, on a repo created 2026-10-28.
๐ The numbers
โข Authors' benchmark, 1 x H100: best in 6 of 8 columns vs TripoSplat, TRELLIS and LGM (SSIM 0.726, LPIPS 0.213, DINOv2 0.781, CLIP 0.885)
โข LGM wins PSNR (12.46 vs 12.25) and speed (1.1 s). Idol takes 6.8 s vs 7.1 s for TRELLIS and 9.9 s for TripoSplat
โข 262,144 Gaussians, 50 steps: 3.4 s on B300, 6.7 s on H100, 19.1 s on RTX 4090, 46.2 s on a 10 GB RTX 3080
๐ ๏ธ Try it
โข Install idol-sdk, accept the terms of the gated DINOv3 and FLUX.2-dev models, run hf auth login
โข python -m idol.sample --image photo.jpg --mode real
โข --num_gaussians runs from 32,768 (0.4 MB) to 1,048,576 (12.2 MB)
โ ๏ธ Caveats
โข Test set and size are not named, and no independent evaluation exists yet
โข The card says "under 2 seconds", but the timing table shows 3.4 s at best
โข Single objects only, NVIDIA CUDA required, no failure cases shown
speridlabs/idol
https://speridlabs.com/research/idol
If you run it on your own messy photos, how do the unseen sides hold up?
๐ Read it elsewhere
โข The deep dive on Medium: https://medium.com/p/5f660ae6ae56
โข The long read on Substack: https://sajjadpakdamansavoji.substack.com/p/speridlabs-idol-builds-3d-splats
โข The thread on X: https://x.com/saavoji/status/2119137739580858545
โข Every version on sajjadpsavoji.github.io: https://sajjadpsavoji.github.io/blog#speridlabs-idol
It writes a standard 3DGS .ply with up to 1,048,576 Gaussians, including sides the picture never showed, and does background removal and framing itself. The catch: the only quality evidence is the authors' own benchmark, on a repo created 2026-10-28.
๐ The numbers
โข Authors' benchmark, 1 x H100: best in 6 of 8 columns vs TripoSplat, TRELLIS and LGM (SSIM 0.726, LPIPS 0.213, DINOv2 0.781, CLIP 0.885)
โข LGM wins PSNR (12.46 vs 12.25) and speed (1.1 s). Idol takes 6.8 s vs 7.1 s for TRELLIS and 9.9 s for TripoSplat
โข 262,144 Gaussians, 50 steps: 3.4 s on B300, 6.7 s on H100, 19.1 s on RTX 4090, 46.2 s on a 10 GB RTX 3080
๐ ๏ธ Try it
โข Install idol-sdk, accept the terms of the gated DINOv3 and FLUX.2-dev models, run hf auth login
โข python -m idol.sample --image photo.jpg --mode real
โข --num_gaussians runs from 32,768 (0.4 MB) to 1,048,576 (12.2 MB)
โ ๏ธ Caveats
โข Test set and size are not named, and no independent evaluation exists yet
โข The card says "under 2 seconds", but the timing table shows 3.4 s at best
โข Single objects only, NVIDIA CUDA required, no failure cases shown
speridlabs/idol
https://speridlabs.com/research/idol
If you run it on your own messy photos, how do the unseen sides hold up?
๐ Read it elsewhere
โข The deep dive on Medium: https://medium.com/p/5f660ae6ae56
โข The long read on Substack: https://sajjadpakdamansavoji.substack.com/p/speridlabs-idol-builds-3d-splats
โข The thread on X: https://x.com/saavoji/status/2119137739580858545
โข Every version on sajjadpsavoji.github.io: https://sajjadpsavoji.github.io/blog#speridlabs-idol
